Model Strategi Tindak Tutur Tokoh Politik dalam Wacana Pembangunan Pendidikan: Sebuah Pendekatan Pragmatik Interpersonal
Abstract
Pentingnya merumuskan sebuah konsepsi ilmiah model strategi tindak tutur tokoh politik dalam wacana pembangunan pendidikan sebagai acuan para tokoh politik dalam bertindak tutur sesuai kapasitasnya pada konteks pendidikan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menemukan model strategi tindak tutur tokoh politik dalam wacana pembangunan pendidikan. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan ancangan pragmalinguistik dan metode R&D dengan model pengembangan ADDIE. Guna menganalisis dan mengevaluasi tuturan tokoh politik dalam wacana pembangunan pendidikan diterapkan pendekatan pragmatik interpersonal. Data dikumpulkan melalui kegiatan observasi pada dokumentasi rekaman rapat kerja Komisi X DPR-RI dan rekaman tayangan berita televisi pada kanal youtube. Hasil penelitian menemukan 66 data tuturan tokoh politik dalam wacana pembangunan pendidikan yang dianalisis secara pragmatik interpersonal untuk selanjutnya dikembangkan sebagai model strategi tindak tutur tokoh politik dalam wacana pembangunan pendidikan. Model strategi tindak tutur tersebut mencakupi penggunaan prinsip kerja sama berbahasa, prinsip kesantunan berbahasa, strategi kesantunan berbahasa, dan strategi retorik interpersonal.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
G. . Leech, Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.
G. Leech, “Politeness: is there an East-West divide?,” 2007, doi: 10.1515/PR.2007.009.
P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena,” in Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 56–311.
M. Haugh, D. Z. Kádár, and S. Mills, “Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates,” J. Pragmat., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.009.
D. Mardiana, “Teori Pragmatik dan Prinsip Kesantunan Geoffrey Neil Leech” dalam Rokhman, F, dkk,” in Dialektika Filsafat Bahasa: Dari Strukturalisme ke Pascastrukturalisme. Semarang: LPPM Universitas Negeri Semarang, Fathur Rokhman, Ed., Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat LPPM Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2021, pp. 47–75. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/498684312/Book-Chapter-Dialektika-Filsafat-Bahasa-Teori-Pragmatik-dan-Prinsip-Kesantunan-Geoffrey-Neil-Leech
M. A. Locher and S. L. Graham, Interpersonal pragmatics, vol. 6. Walter de Gruyter, 2010. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.
J. M. H. Fritz, “Contributions of Gerald M. Phillips to Interpersonal Communication Studies,” Gerald M. Phillips, p. 27, Accessed: Oct. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://pcasite.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/PSS-GMP-2005.pdf#page=31
G. Antos, E. Ventola, and T. Weber, “Introduction: Interpersonal Communication: linguistic points of view,” in Handbook of interpersonal communication, De Gruyter Mouton, 2008, pp. 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.0.1.
H. H. Mayuuf, “Rhetorical Pragmatics. Journal of Advanced Social Research,” J. Adv. Soc. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 19–38, 2015.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Daring,” 2022. Accessed: Sep. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://kbbi.web.id/politikus#google_vignette
M. Shahreza, “Sistem Politik Dan Proses Komunikasi Politik,” pp. 1–34, 2018, doi: 10.31227/osf.io/d9rk4.
D. Mardiana, F. Rokhman, and R. Rustono, “Interpersonal Pragmatics and Critical Linguistics: A Critical Pragmatic Analysis,” in International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology, Semarang, 2021, pp. 736–742. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/ISET/article/view/2038
I. Izhar, F. Rokhman, Rustono, and R. Pristiwati, “Linguistic Etiquette of Serving Food in Local Wisdom of Indonesia’s Manjau Maju Lampung Tribe Society,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311983.2023.2183610.
F. Rokhman, Linguistik Disruptif: Pendekatan Kekinian Memahami Perkembangan Bahasa. Bumi Aksara, 2020.
J. M. Amakali, “Persuasive speech acts in the Namibian National Assembly,” 2016, doi: 1205–1217.https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v7i2.5156.
M. Taufiq and F. Rokhman, “Scientific communication skills profile of prospective science teachers based on sociocultural aspects,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i2.24366.
C. Ilie, “Parliamentary discourse,” Int. Encycl. Lang. Soc. Interact., pp. 1–15, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi201.
N. Fairclough, Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, 1st ed. Routledge, 2013. Accessed: Oct. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203809068-3/critical-discourse-analysis-norman-fairclough
N. Rashidi and M. Souzandehfar, “A critical discourse analysis of the debates between republicans and democrats over the continuation of war in Iraq,” J. Linguist. Intercult. Educ., vol. 3, p. 55, 2010.
S. Hansson, “Calculated overcommunication: Strategic uses of prolixity, irrelevance, and repetition in administrative language,” J. Pragmat., vol. 84, pp. 172–188, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.014.
M. KhosraviNik and J. W. Unger, “Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies,” Methods Crit. discourse Stud., vol. 3, pp. 205–233, 2016, Accessed: Oct. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283213787_KhosraviNik_M_Unger_J_Critical_Discourse_Studies_and_Social_Media_power_resistance_and_critique_in_changing_media_ecologies_In_Ruth_Wodak_and_Michael_Meyer_ed_Methods_of_Critical_Disocurse_Studies_3rd
S. S. M. Hashim and S. Safwat, “Speech acts in political speeches,” J. Mod. Educ. Rev., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 699–706, 2015, doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.05.2015/008.
N. Flores-Ferrán, “I’m very Good at and maybe that’s Why I’m Center Stage…”: Pronominal Deixis and Trump,” English Linguist. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 74, 2017, doi: DOI:https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v6n1p74.
K. D. S. Maskuri, S. Tarjana, D. Djatmika, and D. Purnanto, “Politeness strategies in directive speech acts in local Indonesian parliament assembly proceedings,” Int. J. English Linguist., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 85, 2019, doi: doi:10.5539/ijel.v9n3p85.
J. D. Salayo, “Women’s right, a call for life: A critical discourse analysis of pres. Donald Trump’s speech for the 2020 march for life,” JEELS (Journal English Educ. Linguist. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2020, doi: 10.30762/jeels.v7i1.1906.
A. Haselow, “Expressing stance in spoken political discourse—The function of parenthetical inserts,” Lang. Sci., vol. 82, p. 101334, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101334.
C. How, “A Critical Discourse Study on Meghan and Harry’s CBS Primetime Interview.,” GEMA Online J. Lang. Stud., vol. 22, no. 2, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2202-12.
D. Kartika, R. K. Rahardi, M. Aziz, and W. Rahmat, “Depicting reflections of power on illocutionary acts of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzō Abe’s speeches on Covid-19,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 284–293, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63078.
H. J. Prayitno et al., “The politeness comments on the Indonesian President Jokowi Instagram official account viewed from politico pragmatics and the character education orientation in the disruption era,” Indones. J. Learn. Adv. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 52–71, 2019.
F. Nursyamsi, A. Purnama, and H. Hartono, “Interpersonal meaning in Jokowi’s speech a case study at summit apec,” TheGIST, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019.
N. Majid, “Strategi Komunikasi Politik Dalam Pemilihan Umum Di Era Digital,” PERSEPTIF J. Ilmu Sos. Dan Hum., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 53–61, 2023.
M. Fakhruroji, “Pola komunikasi dan model kepemimpinan Islam,” 2019, Mimbar Pustaka.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D), 5th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2021. Accessed: Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-dan-pengembangan-research-and-development/
P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some universals in language usage, no. 4. Cambridge university press, 1987. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4.
G. Leech, Principles of Pragmatics. Routledge, 2016. doi: 10.4324/9781315835976.
H. Rustono, “Pokok-pokok pragmatik,” 1999, Semarang: CV IKIP Semarang Press.
A. Arifin, Komunikasi politik: filsafat, paradigma, teori, tujuan, strategi, dan komunikasi politik Indonesia, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2011. Accessed: Oct. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=15578
P. Brown, “Politeness and language,” in The International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (IESBS),(2nd ed.), Elsevier, 2015, pp. 326–330. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4.
M. Saragih and A. Arika, “Critical Discourse Analysis on the Politicians’ Social Media Posts,” English Teach. Linguist. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2020, doi: .http://dx.doi.org/10.30596%2Fetlij.v1i1.4120.
C. F. Ononye and N. J. Nwachukwu, “Metalinguistic evaluators and pragmatic strategies in selected hate-inducing speeches in Nigeria,” Indones. J. Appl. Linguist., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.13602.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/kibar.28-10-2024.8015
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Alamat: Kampus A Gedung 1, Lantai 2 | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Tlp: (021) 7818718 – 78835283 (ext. 122) | Tutup hari Minggu dan hari libur nasional Indonesia
Jam Kerja: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.