Kesadaran Metakognitif dalam Menyimak: Aras Pemelajar BIPA Mana yang Lebih Sadar?

Yulia Yulian, Yulianeta Yulianeta, Yeti Mulyati

Abstract


Penelitian ini membandingkan kesadaran metakognitif dan strategi menyimak pemelajar BIPA pada aras dasar, madya, dan mahir. Setelah tes menyimak, delapan peserta mengisi kuesioner kesadaran metakognitif menyimak (MALQ). Data dianalisis dengan menghitung rata-rata lima strategi: directed attention, mental translation, planning and evaluation, problem solving, dan person knowledge. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesadaran metakognitif pemelajar dasar (M=4,26) lebih tinggi dibandingkan pemelajar madya (M=3,93) dan mahir (M=3,84). Pemelajar dasar sering menggunakan strategi directed attention, sementara pemelajar madya lebih bergantung pada mental translation dan problem solving, tetapi jarang menggunakan planning and evaluation. Pemelajar mahir mirip dengan pemelajar dasar dalam penggunaan directed attention, tetapi lebih spontan menggunakan pengetahuan kontekstual. Rendahnya skor person knowledge, terutama di aras madya, menunjukkan kecemasan atau kurangnya kepercayaan diri. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya strategi planning and evaluation dan person knowledge dalam pembelajaran menyimak untuk meningkatkan kesadaran metakognitif dan kepercayaan diri.


Keywords


BIPA; strategi menyimak; kesadaran metakognitif, MALQ

Full Text:

PDF

References


Erizandy DE. Students’metacognitive Awareness On Listening Comprehension At Senior High School Students. Language-Edu [Internet]. 2020; Tersedia pada: https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/LANG/article/view/5368

Wulanjani AN, Indriani L. Metacognitive Strategies Used by EFL Listeners: A Student Need Analysis in Developing Listening Tasks. Metathesis J English Lang Lit Teach. 2019;3(1):60.

Abd Latip NA, Ismail IH, Din WA, Swanto S. Metacognitive Awareness of Listening Strategies and Perception of Listening Skill During Remote Learning. J Inf Syst Technol Manag. 2021;6(23):81–94.

Maknun IHL Il, Rahmati NA. Portrait of EFL College Students on Their Anxiety and Metacognitive Awareness in Listening. JimUnismaAcId [Internet]. 2023;8(3):1–10. Tersedia pada: https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jp3/article/view/21383%0Ahttps://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jp3/article/viewFile/21383/15978

Sihite MR, Amin TS, Ekayati R, Maria L, Manihuruk E, Siregar M, et al. Investigating Metacognitive Strategies in Listening Comprehension among English Language Learners : A Study of University Students in Medan. 2024;03(01):43–54.

Waer H, Ali ADA. Using listening e-journals to raise metacognitive awareness and improve listening comprehension of Egyptian EFL university students [Internet]. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of …. journals.ekb.eg; 2019. Tersedia pada: https://journals.ekb.eg/article_132722_fa7da11cf5abab39485996cdcf21b949.pdf

Andajani K, Pratiwi Y, Suyitno I, Prastio B, Maulidina A. Challenges and Attitudes of L2 Students in Listening to Authentic Conversations Podcasts: A Case Study of Advanced Level BIPA Students. Eurasian J Appl Linguist. 2023;9(3):168–84.

Astuti W, Bewe N. Development of Listening Learning Multimedia Based on Metacognitive Strategies for Intermediate Indonesian for Speakers of Other Language (BIPA) Learners. Int J Soc Sci Educ Stud. 2020;7(3):154–77.

Eva Savitri W, Anam S. University Studentsr Metacognitive Awareness in Listening to English as a Foreign Language. 2018;222(SoSHEC):222–5.

Chero CAC. The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on EFL Low-level Learners’ Listening Performance and Metacognitive Awareness. Int J Instr. 2023;16(2):291–306.

Robillos RJ, Bustos IG. Learners’ Listening Skill and Metacognitive Awareness through Metacognitive Strategy Instruction with Pedagogical Cycle. Int J Instr [Internet]. 2022;15(3):393–412. Tersedia pada: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85134694036

Vandergrift L. Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Lang Teach. 2007;40(3):191–210.

Lee D, Hatesohl D. Extension: University of Missouri. 1993. Listening: Our most used communication skill. Tersedia pada: https://extension2.missouri.edu/cm150

Flavell JH. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry A Model of Cognitive Monitoring. 1979.

Vandergrift L, Goh CCM. Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening [Internet]. New York; 2022. Tersedia pada: www.routledge.

Goh, Christine C. M. Vandergrift L, Mareschal CJ, Tafaghodtari MH. The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and Validation. Vol. 56, Language Learning Research Club. 2006.

Vandergrift L, Goh CCM, Mareschal CJ, ... The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Lang … [Internet]. 2006; Tersedia pada: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x

Li X, Zhang B. Personalized Learning Path Recommendation Algorithm for English Listening Learning. J Electr Syst. 2024;20(6s):2188–99.

Werdiningsih D, Al-Rashidi AH, Azami MI. The Development of Metacognitive Models to Support Students’ Autonomous Learning: Lessons from Indonesian Primary Schools. Educ Res Int. 2022;2022.

Astuti W, Nurhadi N. Need Assesment of Interactive Multimedia Development for Listening Based on Metacognitive Strategy for Intermediate Learners of Bahasa Indonesia for Speakers of Other Languages. 2019.

Anaktototy K. A “Wake-Up Call” for EFL Students: Exploring the Metacognitive Learning Strategy in the Professional Listening Course. REiLA J Res Innov Lang. 2022;4(2):184–96.

Sholihah DN, Ifawati NI, Sari KR, Fatmawati D. Profiling metacognitive awareness in Arabic learners. Strength Prof Spirit Educ through 21st Century Ski Empower a Pandemic Post-Pandemic Era. 2024;(2021):48–55.

Zhai J, Aryadoust V. A meta-analysis of the reliability of a metacognitive awareness instrument in second language listening. Metacognition Learn [Internet]. 2024; Tersedia pada: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11409-024-09392-z

Goh CCM, Hu G. Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Lang Aware [Internet]. 2014; Tersedia pada: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558

Marrapodi J. What doesn’t work for the lowest level literacy learners and why? Apples – J Appl Lang Stud. 2013;7(1):7–23.

Goh CCM. Learners’ cognitive processing problems during comprehension as a basis for L2 listening research. System [Internet]. 2023;119(October):103164. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103164

Qiu X, Xu J. Defining Oracy: Second Language Listening and Speaking Motivation in Higher Education and the Role of Demographic Factors. Psychol Rep. 2023;126(1):332–60.

Irgin P, Ilgun-Dibek M. Investigating the Impact of Listening Strategy Intervention on L2 Listening Development. SSRN Electron J. 2023;

Henderson X. Digital Commons @ CSUMB An Investigation of Metacognitive , Bottom-up and Top-down Strategies in L2 Listening. 2017;

Lieske C. Teaching Effective Second Language Listening. 島根大学外国語教育センタージャーナル. 2007;2(3):39–51.

Robillos RJ. Implementing Translanguaging with Pedagogical Approach in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Listening Classroom. Int J Instr. 2023;16(2):623–42.

Gökmen MF. The role of extensive listening in raising students’ metacognitive awareness of listening skill. ELT Res J [Internet]. 2021; Tersedia pada: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eltrj/issue/67200/981561

Emerick MR. Explicit teaching and authenticity in L2 listening instruction: University language teachers’ beliefs. System [Internet]. 2019;80:107–19. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.004

Haynes L. Student-Generated Focus Points and Self-Assessment Louise Haynes ACADEMIA, Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society, Literature and Language, Nanzan University; Vol. 74, p. 121-134, June 2003. Acad J Nanzan Acad Soc Lit Lang [Internet]. 2003;74(June):121–34. Tersedia pada: http://www.hum.nagoya-cu.ac.jp/~louise/research/assets/student-generated-focus-points.pdf

Oxford RL. Language Learning Strategies What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers; 1990. hal. 117.

Nation I. Vocabulary learning strategies and guessing from context. In: Nation ISP, editor. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. hal. 217–62. (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Tersedia pada: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/CF06A304AEC62828F03E7B9C15C820FA

Zu S, Cai S, Tang W, Wang C, Li L, Shen J. GuessKT: Improving Knowledge Tracing via Considering Guess Behaviors. In: ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). Heinle & Heinle Publishers; 2024. hal. 12811–5.

Alzahrani A. What is the next structure ? Guessing enhances L2 syntactic learning in a syntactic priming task. 2023;(June).

Perdana IG, Narayana P. Understanding The Crucial Factors to Successfully Acquire a Target Language. Int J Multicult Multireligious Underst. 2023;10(6):289–95.

Safa MA. The impact of scaffolding and nonscaffolding strategies on the EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. J Educ Res [Internet]. 2017;110(5):447–56. Tersedia pada: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85019608132

Safa MA. Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Lang Teach Res [Internet]. 2021; Tersedia pada: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85108850720

Prasongngern P, Soontornwipast K. Effects of Listening Strategy Instruction Incorporating Intensive and Extensive Listening on Listening Skills and Metacognitive Awareness. [Internet]. International Journal of Instruction. e-iji.net; 2023. Tersedia pada: https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2023_4_10.pdf

Zeng Y, Goh CCM. A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its impact on listening achievement and metacognitive awareness. Stud Second Lang Learn … [Internet]. 2018; Tersedia pada: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=675379

Sharif MY, Ferdous F. Sources and suggestions to lower listening comprehension anxiety in the EFL classroom: A case study. English Lang Teach. 2012;5(10):92–104.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/kibar.28-10-2024.8018

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Alamat: Kampus A Gedung 1, Lantai 2 | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Tlp: (021) 7818718 – 78835283 (ext. 122) | Tutup hari Minggu dan hari libur nasional Indonesia
Jam Kerja: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.