Tren, Tantangan, dan Prospek Penerapan Computational Thinking dalam Pembelajaran Fisika: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Sistematis

Halleyna Widyasari, Ria Asep Sumarni, Fita Widiyatun

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tren, tantangan, dan prospek penerapan Computational Thinking dalam pembelajaran fisika serta menguji dampaknya terhadap pengembangan keterampilan problem-solving siswa. Metode yang digunakan adalah Kajian Literatur Sistematis (SLR) dengan mengacu pada kerangka PRISMA. Pencarian dilakukan di database Scopus (2015-2025) menggunakan kombinasi keyword Computational Thinking dan pendidikan fisika, menghasilkan 16 artikel final yang dianalisis secara visualisasi bibliometrik VOSviewer. Hasil tinjauan menunjukkan bahwa tren implementasi Computational Thinking telah berevolusi dari penggunaan software simulasi umum menuju integrasi pemrograman spesifik (Python) sebagai medium utama untuk pemodelan dan analisis data laboratorium. Penerapan Computational Thinking memiliki dampak positif signifikan dalam meningkatkan keterampilan problem-solving dan pemodelan siswa melalui penguatan kemampuan abstraksi dan dekomposisi masalah. Namun, implementasi ini menghadapi tantangan besar pada aspek pedagogis, yaitu kurangnya kompetensi guru dalam mengintegrasikan Computational Thinking secara efektif. Oleh karena itu, prospek penelitian merekomendasikan standardisasi kurikulum berbasis Python dan pengembangan profesional guru untuk optimalisasi integrasi Computational Thinking dalam fisika.


Keywords


Computational Thinking, Pembelajaran Fisika, Problem-Solving, Kajian Literatur Sistematis

References


Bott, T. E., Weller, D. P., Caballero, M. D., & Irving, P. W. (2019). Student-identified themes around computation in high school physics. In Y. Cao, S. Wolf, & M. Bennett (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 57–62). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Bott

Elisabeth, G. C., Elizabeth, A., Dua, Y. S., & Koten, F. P. N. (2023). Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Aplikasi LiveWire untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreativitas Siswa pada Materi Rangkaian Arus Searah. Variabel, 6(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.26737/var.v6i1.4089

Fayanto, S., Naba, S. D., Kurniawan, A., Putri, U. N., & Padang, V. D. (2024). The Analyze Comparative of Physics Computational Thinking Skill (CTs) in Experiment Laboratory. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a699

Graves, A. L., & Light, A. D. (2020). Hitting the Ground Running: Computational Physics Education to Prepare Students for Computational Physics Research. Computing in Science and Engineering, 22(4), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2963670

Herlina, K., Abdurrahman, A., Umam, A. N., Nurjanah, A., Rabbani, G. F., & Pratiwi, F. A. I. (2025). Expression-Based E-Worksheet (EBEW): An Effort To Enhance Student’ Computational Thinking Skills. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2210

Khasanah, U., Supahar, S., Fitria, T., Prasasti, N. H., & Malik, E. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review: Implementation of Computational Thinking in Physics Learning in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.6675

Kitagawa, M., Fishwick, P., Kesden, M., Urquhart, M., Guadagno, R., Jin, R., Tran, N., Omogbehin, E., Prakash, A., Awaraddi, P., Hale, B., Suura, K., Raj, A., Stanfield, J., & Vo, H. (2019). Scaffolded training environment for physics programming (STEPP). 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316480.3325513

Lane, W. B., Galanti, T. M., & Rozas, X. L. (2023). Teacher Re-novicing on the Path to Integrating Computational Thinking in High School Physics Instruction. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6(2), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00100-1

Lapawi, N., & Husnin, H. (2020). Investigating Students’ Computational Thinking Skills on Matter Module. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2020.0111140

Leak, A. E., Santos, Z., Reiter, E., Zwickl, B. M., & Martin, K. N. (2018). Hidden factors that influence success in the optics workforce. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010136

Lestari, E. A., Maulida, I., & Sari, C. K. (2025). Analisis Pendekatan Steam Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sekolah Dasar Kelas V. SCIENCE Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(3), 1106–1115. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i3.6659

Listiani, F., Hernawati, D., Mustofa, R. F., & Badriah, L. (2025). Potret Awal Keterampilan Berpikir Analitis Dan Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Peserta Didik Di SMP Al-Madinah. SCIENCE Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4429

Manu, F. A., Ramaila, S., & Ramnarain, U. (2025). The Role of Arduino-Assisted Robotics Coding Application in Physics Learning: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 32(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v32i02/189-211

Meriska, N., & Sudibyo, E. (2025). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. SCIENCE Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(1), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4684

Nailinda, V., Alim, J. A., & Sekarwinahyu, M. (2025). Implementasi Pembelajaran Stem (Science, Technology, Engineering, And Mathematics) Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. SCIENCE Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 5(1), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.51878/science.v5i1.4700

Rosadah, M. F., Yuliani, Y., & Kurniawan, A. (2024). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. LEARNING Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v4i2.2896

Safitri, S. Y., Suharno, S., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Computational Thinking and Scientific Modules: Effectiveness on Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Skills. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v14i1.86266

Subramaniam, R. C., Morphew, J. W., Rebello, C. M., & Rebello, N. S. (2025). Presenting STEM ways of a thinking framework for engineering design-based physics problems. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010122

Subramaniam, S., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Computational thinking in mathematics education: A systematic review. In Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences (Vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 2029–2044). SciencePark Science, Organization and Counseling LTD. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7494

Sung, W., & Black, J. B. (2020). Factors to consider when designing effective learning: Infusing computational thinking in mathematics to support thinking-doing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1784066

Tofel-Grehl, C., Searle, K. A., & Ball, D. (2022). Thinking Thru Making: Mapping Computational Thinking Practices onto Scientific Reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(6), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09989-6

Tufino, E., Oss, S., & Alemani, M. (2024). Integrating Python data analysis in an existing introductory laboratory course. European Journal of Physics, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad4fcc

Tufino, E., Oss, S., & Alemani, M. (2025). Using Jupyter Notebooks to foster computational skills and professional practice in an introductory physics lab course. In Z. Jeskova & J. Hanc (Eds.), Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2950, Issue 1). Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2950/1/012022

Wastriani, E., Bhakti, Y. B., & Fatahillah, F. (2024). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa (Eksperimen Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMK Wirabuana 2 Bojong Gede).

Watkins, J., Ivanov, N., Hinko, K., & Mohan, K. (2023). Investigating Perceptions of Relevance Towards Computation in an Introductory Physics for Life Science Course. In D. Jones, Q. X. Ryan, & A. Pawl (Eds.), Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 380–385). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2023.pr.Watkins

Weller, D. P., Bott, T. E., Caballero, M. D., & Irving, P. W. (2022). Development and illustration of a framework for computational thinking practices in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020106

Zakwandi, R., & Istiyono, E. (2023). A framework for assessing computational thinking skills in the physics classroom: study on cognitive test development. SN Social Sciences, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00633-7




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/semnasristek.v10i1.8867

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Prosiding SEMNAS RISTEK indexed by: