Heutagogy Curriculum for Higher Education Management

Hendro Prasetyono, Toto Widiarto, Zainal Abidin, Agus Abdillah, Burhanudin Burhanudin

Abstract


Abstract. Industrial Revolution 4.0 has caused economic and social disruption. The current management of higher education must focus on producing graduates who are in accordance with their needs. Heutagogy is an educational approach that can be used by higher education management. This article is compiled based on the results of thoughts supported by a literature review using meta-analysis with collected 26 articles. The Heutagogy approach of educators facilitates the learning process by providing guidance and learning resources, but in the course of the learning process is fully left to students. Transformation of the heutagogy learning paradigm, which provides learning menu choices and opportunities for students to design their own learning. Higher education that produces generation 4.0 requires a dynamic and flexible transdisciplinary curriculum management. Curriculum management that provides cross-disciplinary curricular menus needs to be developed so as to enable students to develop new studies in their disciplines through a transdisciplinary learning process.
Keywords: industrial revolution, heutagogy, literature review, higher education


References


A. C. Pereira and F. Romero, “A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 13, pp. 1206–1214, 2017.

R. Y. Zhong, X. Xu, E. Klotz, and S. T. Newman, “Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 616–630, 2017.

G. Erdoğan, “Land Selection Criteria for Lights Out Factory Districts During the Industry 4.0 Process,” J. Urban Manag., vol. xxxx, no. July 2019, pp. 1–9, 2019.

E. N. Zalta, “The Concept of Evolution to 1872 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.” Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, p. 1, 2014.

H. Bagir, “Pendidikan VS Kecerdasan Buatan,” Kompas, Jakarta, p. 6, Sep-2018.

D. Mourtzis, E. Vlachou, G. Dimitrakopoulos, and V. Zogopoulos, “Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 -The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept,” in Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 23, no. 2017, pp. 129–134.

A. Benešová and J. Tupa, “Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 11, no. June, pp. 2195–2202, 2017.

T. R. S. Rauen, Á. G. R. Lezana, and V. da Silva, “Environmental Management: An Overview in Higher Education Institutions,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 3, no. Ahfe, pp. 3682–3688, 2015.

A. Benešová and J. Tupa, “Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0,” in Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, vol. 11, no. June, pp. 2195–2202.

S. Hase and C. Kenyon, Self-Determined Learning: Heutagogy in Action, 15th ed., vol. 1. Beaverton: Ringgold Inc, 2014.

M. Ayres, A. Proce, A. Monk, and L. McCarthy, “Using a Heutagogical Approach to Develop an Undergraduate GCA Module: Developing GCA V2,” Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, vol. 287, no. 1, p. S35, 2016.

J. J. Talati, “Lifelong Learning: Established Concepts and Evolving Values,” Arab J. Urol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2014.

S. Hase and C. Kenyon, “Semantic Play and Possibility Invited Contribution Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory,” An Int. J. Complex. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 111–118, 2007.

M. Canţer, “E-heutagogy for lifelong e-learning,” Procedia Technol., vol. 1, pp. 129–131, 2012.

S. Hase and C. Kenyon, “Moving from Andragogy to Heutagogy: Implications for VET,” Proc. Res. to Real. Putt. VET Res. to Work, no. January 2001, pp. 1–8, 2001.

J. D. Twizeyimana and A. Andersson, “The public value of E-Government – A literature review,” Gov. Inf. Q., no. June 2017, pp. 1–12, 2019.

S. Dixit, S. N. Mandal, J. V. Thanikal, and K. Saurabh, “Evolution of studies in construction productivity: A systematic literature review (2006–2017),” Ain Shams Eng. J., no. xxxx, 2019.

A. H. H. Rohayani, Kurniabudi, and Sharipuddin, “A Literature Review: Readiness Factors to Measuring e-Learning Readiness in Higher Education,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 59, no. Iccsci, pp. 230–234, 2015.

N. Tvenge and K. Martinsen, “Integration of digital learning in industry 4.0,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 23, no. 2017, pp. 261–266, 2018.

Lisa Marie Blaschke, “Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 89, no. 244, pp. 373–393, 2016.

S. Hase, “Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: some challenges and opportunities,” J. Appl. Res. Work. E-Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 8, 2012.

B. Motyl, G. Baronio, S. Uberti, D. Speranza, and S. Filippi, “How will Change the Future Engineers’ Skills in the Industry 4.0 Framework? A Questionnaire Survey,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 11, no. June, pp. 1501–1509, 2017.

N. Canning and S. Callan, “Heutagogy: Spirals of Reflection to Empower Learners in Higher Education,” Reflective Pract., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 71–82, 2010.

V. Msila and A. Setlhako, “Teaching (still) Matters: Experiences on Developing a Heutagogical Online Module at UNISA,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 69, no. Iceepsy 2012, pp. 136–142, 2012.

R. Rusli, A. Rahman, and H. Abdullah, “Student perception data on online learning using heutagogy approach in the faculty of mathematics and Natural Sciences of Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia,” Data Br., no. January, pp. 1–6, 2020.

N. Makarim, “Merdeka Belajar: Kampus Merdeka.” Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, Jakarta, pp. 1–6, 2020.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.