A Linguistic Study of Euphemism and Dysphemism in Lois Lowry’s The Giver And George Orwell’s Animal Farm

Fajar Duriat, Mashadi Said, Supadi Supadi

Abstract


This study investigates the use of euphemisms and dysphemisms in Lois Lowry’s The Giver and George Orwell’s Animal Farm. The aim of the research is to examine the use of euphemisms and dysphemisms in The Giver and Animal Farm within the framework of Politeness Theory, focusing on how these linguistic strategies influence societal norms and individual roles. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method, which focuses on the detailed analysis and interpretation of textual data. The results demonstrate that euphemisms align with negative politeness and off record strategies to obscure unpleasant truths, while dysphemisms correspond with bald on record strategies to directly attack and discredit. Both novels strategically employ euphemisms to soften harsh realities and maintain societal control, while dysphemisms are used to stigmatize opposition and reinforce authority. The implication of this study is that it highlights how language shapes reality, enabling students to critically analyze linguistic manipulation. Moreover, by examining euphemisms and dysphemisms in The Giver and Animal Farm, students gain insights into control, power, and oppression, while exploring the connection between language and societal critique in dystopian literature.

Keywords


dystopian literature; societal control; language manipulation; authoritarian systems

References


Alfarhan, Ins. Eqbal. A. (2024). The Influence of Literature on the Society. Print)

International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10886693

Ardyan, E. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif : Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di Berbagai Bidang. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Green, P. (2021). Euphemisms in modern literature: A critical analysis of Lois Lowry's The Giver. Palgrave Macmillan.

Iswara, A. A. (2020). The Form and Use of Dysphemism in Hoax. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020), 509. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.005

Miller, S. (2022). Language control and societal influence: A linguistic approach. Penguin Books.

Noletto, I. (2024). Fictional Languages in Science Fiction Literature. Taylor & Francis.

Smith, G. W. H., & Jacobsen, M. H. (2022). The Routledge international handbook of Goffman studies. Routledge.

Thompson, H. (2019). Reader perception and language manipulation in literary texts. Bloomsbury Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/senndika.v2i1.8442

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Fajar Duriat, Mashadi Said, Supadi Supadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

(Pascasarjana) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Kampus A Building 2, 3nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. 

Tlp. (021) 78835283

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.